Defined scope
Objectives, responsibilities, assumptions, and boundaries aligned before execution.

Diagnostic → Project → Operations → Evolution
We plan and implement infrastructure, cloud, and security improvements with a defined scope, documentation, and result validation.
Clear engagement
Each project starts with a concrete need and moves forward with documented responsibilities, decisions, and acceptance criteria.
Objectives, responsibilities, assumptions, and boundaries aligned before execution.
Technical decisions ordered by risk, operational impact, and company context.
Planned implementation with change records and a rollback plan when relevant.
Architecture, configurations, inventories, or procedures produced for the project.
Evidence and acceptance criteria defined to confirm the contracted outcome.
Knowledge transfer and a structured handoff to the team or contracted operation.
Project catalog
Engage a one-off initiative or build a phased journey. Each project highlights its primary MaaS® layer and may involve other layers according to environment dependencies.
Accounts, email, and documents without consistent controls.
Companies using Microsoft 365 that need to organize identities, permissions, and collaboration protection.
The final composition is defined in the diagnostic and technical proposal.
Discuss this projectUnprotected accounts, uncontrolled sharing, and scattered files.
Organizations that need to standardize administration, access, and information lifecycle in Google Workspace.
The final composition is defined in the diagnostic and technical proposal.
Discuss this projectBackups without a strategy or unproven recovery.
Environments where downtime or data loss requires clear recovery objectives and procedures.
The final composition is defined in the diagnostic and technical proposal.
Discuss this projectFailures discovered only after they affect operations.
Companies that need visibility into infrastructure and critical services.
The final composition is defined in the diagnostic and technical proposal.
Discuss this projectCloud consumption without visibility and poorly sized resources.
Cloud operations that need to understand cost, capacity, and consumption ownership.
The final composition is defined in the diagnostic and technical proposal.
Discuss this projectAging infrastructure, insufficient capacity, or difficulty scaling.
Environments that need to renew servers or virtualization, or adopt cloud with controlled risk.
The final composition is defined in the diagnostic and technical proposal.
Discuss this projectUnstable connectivity and lack of segmentation and control.
Companies with offices, branches, hybrid work, or distributed services.
The final composition is defined in the diagnostic and technical proposal.
Discuss this projectComputers without centralized protection and administration.
Teams that need standardized security, configuration, and updates for corporate devices.
The final composition is defined in the diagnostic and technical proposal.
Discuss this projectNo criteria for access, sharing, and retention.
Organizations that need to understand their repositories and apply rules proportional to the information handled.
The final composition is defined in the diagnostic and technical proposal.
Discuss this projectUnknown or unvalidated technical exposure.
Environments that need to identify vulnerabilities or validate exploitability through authorized testing.
A vulnerability assessment identifies and analyzes exposure. Penetration testing adds controlled manual exploitation within the authorized scope; an automated scan is not equivalent to a penetration test.
The final composition is defined in the diagnostic and technical proposal.
Discuss this projectMaaS® Architecture
The primary layer guides the project. Technical dependencies may connect the delivery to other layers without expanding scope without approval.
Network, connectivity, computing, and technical foundations.
Access, devices, collaboration, and security controls.
Recovery, resilience, and interruption readiness.
Visibility, policies, indicators, and coordinated evolution.
Delivery process
Understanding the environment, need, and relevant constraints.
Definition of deliverables, responsibilities, assumptions, and acceptance.
Architecture, implementation plan, and technical decisions.
Execution with change control and impact communication.
Testing, evidence, documentation, and open-item records.
Knowledge transfer and continuity definition, when contracted.
Common deliverables
Artifacts are selected according to each project's type, size, and scope.
Not every project includes the same documents, tools, or a monthly operation. The technical proposal records exactly what will be delivered.
After delivery
The project may end after validation and handoff. When appropriate, Apix can provide support, monitoring, and evolution under a separate contract with its own responsibilities and SLA.
Explore MaaS® Operations & SupportFrequently asked questions
Yes. A one-off project has its own scope, start, completion, and delivery criteria. Ongoing support is optional and contracted separately.
The diagnostic gathers the information needed to size scope, dependencies, assumptions, investment, and schedule in a technical proposal.
Impacts and change windows are evaluated during planning. When relevant, the solution includes a pilot, communication, and rollback plan.
Yes, provided responsibilities, access, and interfaces are defined in the project scope and governance.
Each project has a primary layer. Other layers may be involved when dependencies exist, always within the approved scope.
Start with a diagnostic to turn the need into clear priorities, scope, and next steps.